In what may have been the first hint of victory for opponents of
the Trans Texas Corridor, a high-ranking Texas Department of
Transportation official said Thursday he regretted his
agency's communication
failures and said one proposed version of
the corridor, a 10-lane super highway with rail and
utility pathways, will "probably not" be built in East Texas, based
on the overwhelming resistance to the idea expressed at public
hearings on the project this month.
Phillip Russell,
assistant executive director for
innovative project development at TxDOT,
was the keynote speaker at the Lone
Star Legislative Summit at SFA Thursday, where he
told listeners that "a lot of people that are supporting the notion
of (TTC) 69 only do so if we use the existing roadway."
Russell said the most likely plan, based on public input,
will be an enlargement of U.S. Hwy 59, with additional services like
rail and utilities added as needed in separate areas — a departure
from the plan for a 1,200 foot wide corridor that would pass east of
Nacogdoches and gobble up thousands of acres of private land.
"Is it still possible that it might make sense to have
all of that in a single corridor?" Russel said.
"Yes. But is it more likely that it will be
separated, and there will be pieces here and there?
Yeah, I think clearly that's the direction
we're heading."
Public comments on the TTC-69 project are being collected
through March 19, and Russell acknowledged that there is a
long, legally prescribed process before any final decisions are
made. The three official options for the TTC project call for taking
no action at all; building a whole new highway described in the Tier
One Draft Environmental Impact Statement released last year; or
enlarging existing highways. TxDOT officials have always said their
policy is to consider the latter option first, but with the emphatic
outcry against new construction, Russell said, that option is
seeming more and more likely to become reality.
"I would be very surprised if we hear any other comments other
than 'stay on 59 if you build it,'" Russell said. "I would
anticipate — me as one person at TxDOT — that's where my view is.
We need to look very closely at 59 — add lanes to 59."
Russell's remarks, though encouraging for those opposed to the
highway project, are far from a final decision on the project. A
revised environmental impact statement addressing substantive
comments collected at public meetings, will face review by the
federal highway administration this winter.
Nor would enlarging the footprint of U.S. Hwy 59 relieve
landowners completely of the risk of having their land acquired for
government use. Because the existing right-of-way
around the U.S. Hwy 59 is so narrow,
surrounding land would almost certainly be condemned to
accommodate extra lanes or bypass routes involved in the expansion.
"It does create some challenges, obviously," Russell said.
"Trying to build 59 through Houston is something else. And even if
you come up here through East Texas, whether it's through
Nacogdoches or Lufkin or Diboll, we're going have to look pretty
closely."
Russell said the state would work with cities and counties on the
process. He also encouraged everyone in attendance at the luncheon
to participate in the commenting process, which he said was of
paramount importance.
Those in the audience did not seem fazed by Russell's remarks
about the highway, and most of the questions asked after his
presentation focused on the lack of mass transit systems in Texas.
During his talk, Russell also touched on the financial aspect of
public transportation in Texas, essentially repeating the
conclusions of a recently released report by the federal government
that describes an aging and increasingly-ineffective revenue system.
Russell said
tolls will be essential to fund
any work on the TTC, and said
consumers may also see a hike in the fuel tax, which has been
stagnant since 1991.
Bruce Partain, CEO and president of the Nacogdoches County
Chamber of Commerce, which hosted the legislative summit, said his
organization will continue to provide information about the TTC
project to the community.
Nacogdoches TX.
Comments
By bentfork (martha estes)
Feb 22, 2008 11:59 AM | Link to this
Dear CITIZEN Readers,
Let's see..Primary Voting has begun and there is a grassroots' effort to hold accountable those who are incumbents and their challengers to DECLARE their complete OPPOSITION to the HB 3588 mandated Trans Texas Corridor footprint. Is this "public, personal reflection" being "allowed" from TxDOT's PHIL RUSSELL to help diffuse some anxiety as VOTERS go into their precincts to choose who might be "on the team" that brought us the VETO of the Private Property Rights bill HB 2006 and squelched other crucial legislation which did NOT get past the GATEKEEPERS in the Texas House and Senate? Mmm.. I wonder, but I do NOT STOP my pressure on officeholders to follow the MANDATES of the people as I wonder. ACTION not APATHY!
By Joey
Feb 22, 2008 9:34 AM
For those near the 59 exspansion who will lose their homes, TXDOT should dig deep into their pockets, very deep, because they definitely will make their money back and then some. Thank you for staying on top of this very critical issue. The public deserves to have very important non-biased informaton from our media sources to keep our Democratic process strong. No info. is biased info.
Thanks,
Joey
By stopthettc
Feb 22, 2008 8:59 AM
The key words are "me as one person at TxDot." Phillip Russell is an appointed official by Rick Perry and can be easily replaced at any time. He has NO obligation to fulfill the wishes of taxpayers and voters. His job is to make us feel more secure about funding the NAFTA Supertollway that benefits only Mexico and China. Phillip Russell could promise Texans the world, while TxDot and Rick Perry plow ahead in condenming 600,000 acres of farmland. Do not allow his fluff statements to deflate the growing opposition in East Texas. Continue to write TxDot, Rick Perry, and your elected official until this issue is dead.