Toll-road skeptics and others who
oppose long-term leases on Texas roads to private companies,
especially foreign ones, are citing the work of a Texas
Transportation Institute scholar to make their case for
traditional road financing with fuel taxes.
Ironically, the
findings by associate research scientist David Ellis appear
in a report by the Governor's Business Council. And the
council, reflecting Gov. Rick Perry's own strong views, is
very much in favor of tolls.
Caught in the middle, Ellis says
his work is being misinterpreted.
"People find in there what they want to
find and read what they want to read," he said. "This report
says tolls are an important part of this proposition."
That's true, but
the report, "Shaping the Competitive
Advantage of Texas Metropolitan Regions,"
also explores the option of
increasing the gasoline tax — a move many conservationists
say would have the additional benefits of encouraging fuel
efficiency and discouraging unnecessary travel.
The researchers began by asking how much
road construction would be needed to eliminate the worst
bottlenecks in the state's eight largest metro areas, said
Texas Transportation Institute researcher Tim Lomax.
Accomplishing that, they calculated, would
result in a typical rush-hour trip in the Houston
metropolitan area taking 18 percent longer than one when
traffic flows freely.
At present, Lomax said, that trip takes
about 25 percent longer than during free flow.
Without the added capacity, he said,
congestion and delays in Houston and the other metro areas
will rise sharply over the next 25 years as population and
commerce increase.
Construction funding
The construction cost the researchers came
up with was $66 billion over 25 years. That's close to the
Texas Department of Transportation's estimate of $68
billion.
TxDOT also estimates it would cost $9
billion each to do the same for smaller urban areas and
rural roads, for a total of $86 billion statewide.
Then Ellis looked at ways to raise the
needed money.
"We have an $86 billion problem out there
that gets worse every year and three sources of
revenue that lose value to inflation every year,"
he said. These are:
•The state gasoline tax of 20 cents a
gallon.
•Vehicle-registration fees based on vehicle weight.
•The 18.4-cent-per-gallon refund of federal gasoline tax to
Texas.
Ellis said none of the three is based on costs, so when
these go up, the purchasing power of the revenue falls. For
example, he said, "The 20-cent gas tax was put in effect in
1991 and is now worth 14 cents in purchasing power."
Among Ellis' proposed solutions is
a one-time increase in the gasoline tax, followed by
automatic adjustments for inflation in the cost of
road-building over the 25 years.
He concluded — and this is what excited
toll opponents — the state could raise $66 billion for the
eight metro areas by hiking the 20-cent tax to 28 cents and
tying it to the Highway Construction Index, a sort of
Consumer Price Index for road builders.
'Every available tool'
Another method he proposed is toll
financing, but that was old news.
"Whether we toll, raise the gas tax, index
the tax or issue bonds (against the expected tax revenue),
we get these benefits as long as we get the job done," he
said. "We have to employ every available tool."
Although the Texas Transportation
Institute and the Business Council did not look at rural
areas and smaller cities, Ellis noted that the fuel tax
would have to be raised higher to cover their needs, too.
"You have a lot of roadway out there," he said.
Nor did the study address Perry's
grand plan for the Trans-Texas Corridor, a network
of massive toll road, rail and pipeline facilities linking
urban areas. Staggering tax increases would be needed to pay
for such huge projects, and Perry's plan would lease
corridor segments to private companies to build and operate.
Support for the report
One who welcomed the report is David
Stall, a former Columbus city manager who opposes the
corridor plan and the increased reliance on toll funding
generally on the Web site www.corridorwatch.com.
"People are coming to the
realization that tolls may not be the best way to build
every road," Stall said — although he said they are
appropriate for roads that let motorists choose to pay a fee
for a faster ride.
Stall does not support allowing a
company to build and operate a state-owned toll road for 50
years and reap the profits. "They're just taking money out
of your own pocket and giving it back to you while they keep
a piece of the action," he said.
Although fuel-tax increases are unpopular,
Stall says that a driver who gets 20 miles to the gallon and
drives a toll road at a typical fee of 15 cents a mile is
paying the equivalent of a $3-per-gallon gas tax.
Toll-road leasing
TxDOT spokesman Randall Dillard noted that
"the Legislature sets transportation-funding policy, and to
date, the Legislature has given us options that do not
require an increase in the gas tax.
"These options focus on innovation,
private-sector investment and choice for users," he said.
Supporters of leasing toll roads to
private firms say the money to build them can be raised
quickly by tapping the equity market — investors who will
put up construction dollars now and are willing to wait for
long-term profits.
This gets concrete poured a lot faster
than waiting for voters to approve a bond issue or
legislators a fuel tax hike, they contend. And time is
money.
"Public-private partnerships can mobilize
these investments much more quickly," said New York state
transportation Commissioner Thomas J. Madison Jr. "And by
moving projects up faster, you're saving a lot of money lost
to inflation."
In all, said TxDOT's Dillard, the
report has had a good effect: "More people are discussing
and working on the transportation problem."
rad.sallee@chron.com